Mar 182023
 

Okay, here goes. I’m just going to say it.

I’m an alien.

Like, from outer space.

My name is Wiptee-poof Blipticon. Greetings from Gliggablork!

I’m revealing myself because I want to explain the Fermi Paradox to you. I can no longer stand by while you people spout nonsense and freak out over nothing. The answer will put you at ease.

Your cosmologists and theoretical physicists are baffled by a number of unresolved mysteries, e.g. dark energy, dark matter, baryonic asymmetry, quantum gravity, the blackhole information paradox, the Vacuum Catastrophe, the Problem of Time, and the Fermi Paradox, just to name a few.

Many of these are tied together such that the answer to one automatically resolves another. The Fermi Paradox and dark matter are like that.

One day in the summer of 1950, the physicist Enrico Fermi had an epiphany. He realized that there’s a high probability that intelligent aliens exist, yet there’s a lack of evidence that they actually do, which is weird. When the epiphany hit him, he famously blurted to his research buddies at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, “But where is everybody?”

The answer:

We’re everywhere.

Your scientists have correctly theorized the following:

  1. With 70 sextillion stars in the universe, and with planets orbiting most of them, life should be abundant.
  2. Even if intelligent lifeforms only evolve on a small percentage of these planets, there should be multiple alien civilizations out there.
  3. Some of these civilizations must have started millions of years ago. By now they must be super advanced.
  4. And they’ve had time to spread everywhere.

If these statements are true, why don’t Earthlings see evidence for aliens, like derelict probes or gas stations on asteroids?

To explain the answer, I first need to clarify a couple of misconceptions that show up in your science fiction.

Firstly, there are (almost) no evil alien civilizations. If you think about this rationally for a minute, it’s clear why.

As you’ve guessed, life is prolific in the universe. And not all of it is very nice. There are indeed mean little beasties out there amongst the stars. Actually, there’s an unthinkably large number of them.

But it turns out that there’s an evolutionary pattern that is so reliable, we consider it a law:

Technological advancement requires cooperation.

When you contemplate your own species, what may come to your mind is the selfishness and violence. You project this onto alien species.

But we’re not like that. And you guys aren’t nearly as bad as you think, either, and you’re getting better quickly.

As your technology advances, the level of cooperation required to continue advancing grows, and the utility in conflict decreases. Selfishness reaps rewards in the short term, but it doesn’t pay off in the final measure. This holds true even in regard to the worst sort of technological advancement: weapons of mass destruction.

When you consider, for example, a missile with a nuclear warhead, you might look on it with disgust and think, “We are such warlike creatures.” But consider the supply chain required to produce that missile – the networks of people and corporations and countries that must work together to make such a thing possible. The fancier the missile, the more cooperation and interdependence is involved in producing it. This interdependence diminishes the incentives for war. If the missile is used to destroy any part of the great web of cooperation that produced it, then no more missiles can be made.

Anything imaginable is possible when you work together. But when you stop working together, advancement stops. It doesn’t only stop; it backslides. The supply chains break. The institutions that perpetuate knowledge are destroyed. Civilization wanes.

This is the Great Filter:

Evil is inherently self-destructive.

Evil species can’t advance beyond a certain point because their inability to cooperate is naturally self-limiting.

And so, the most technologically advanced alien civilizations, by this law, are also highly, intensely, passionately, religiously cooperative. I can’t overstate how much value we put on getting along with others.

Now, I admit, once every blue moon, by some perverse miracle, an advanced alien civilization that is evil does emerge.

But they’re vanishingly rare. And they don’t get very far. They’re massively outnumbered by the good guys, like my people, the Gliggablorks, and they’re much less advanced than us. So, we deal them. Non-violently.

The second misconception most Earthlings hold is that the pace of technological advancement is always linear.

Technological advancement accelerates, and it brings social advancement with it.

The reason you assume it’s linear is because roughly linear advancement is what you’ve experienced historically. But your civilization is young.

Once a civilization creates truly useful AI, as your civilization is on the brink of doing, the pace of technological advancement accelerates exponentially or even logarithmically. It explodes.

This is because AI improves the efficiency in anything people do. And one thing people do is create and improve AI systems. Successive generations of AI therefore improve faster and faster.

Every alien civilization jumps virtually overnight from Type 0, where you’re currently at, to Type III on the Kardashev scale.

That’s why most of your science fiction is so silly. You dwell on stages of technological development that no alien civilization has actually experienced – because we skip them.

There are no intermediary levels of advancement. The starships and spacesuits and laser battles that you guys like to imagine are completely off base. Star Wars? There are no wars in space! At least not ones that span more than a single solar system.

None.

What is actually happening out there amongst the stars is way, way cooler than that.

That brings us to the effect we call Unification.

However unique the biology of any given alien species may be, however different they may be linguistically, socially, and culturally from all other aliens, when they merge with their computers and then experience explosive growth in their intelligence and technology, they change into something else. Their biological components take on a reduced role. As the organizing principle of their lives moves away from the mere fulfillment of biological imperatives, they ascend to a state that is essentially similar to all the other advanced alien civilizations.

They unify.

This is a process that is repeating in every galaxy across the universe. Unification is similar to convergent evolution in the field of biology. And it works like a biological law, like evolution itself.

Did you know six new stars are born in the Milky Way each year?

Unification is so reliable that you can make predictions about it in the same way you can predict star births, supernovas, black holes, pulsars, quasars, and everything else that is going on up there in the night sky.

A new species will unify once every 100 Earth years. That’s when their star disappears from sight.

Now to answer the Fermi Paradox:

The reason so much of the galaxy is dark to you is because we’re using it for energy. The way we generate energy is more complicated (and efficient) than a Dyson Sphere, but like a Dyson Sphere, our process hides matter and light but not gravity.

The 27% of the universe that you cannot see, but that you’ve correctly deduced from its gravitational effects must exist, is us.

The reason you don’t see our probes is because we don’t often need probes, and when we do, we’re not amateurs. We don’t use tech you would see.

The reason we aren’t up in your grill is because we’re giving you space to figure yourselves out.

UFOs aren’t us. Sorry, but the idea that an alien spaceship would be advanced enough to travel thousands of light years across the galaxy only to hit a goose in your upper atmosphere and crash in New Mexico is phenomenally stupid. And so is the idea that we’re abducting humans to sodomize you with metallic space dildos.

We don’t need to do any of that stuff to learn about you.

We can study you from the comfort of our homes. You can’t even begin to imagine how awesome our telescopes are.

And we’re not after the natural resources on your planet, either, like your water or your pickle juice or whatever. It’s not that Earth isn’t beautiful and special. But the minerals and other elements on Earth are abundant throughout the universe. We have all the pickle juice we need, and we don’t have to enslave or eradicate living beings to get more.

The only interesting thing to us on Earth is you.

(And not because we want to eat you. That’s gross.)

When you do see us, it will be because we want you to see us. And that hasn’t happened yet. When it does, it’ll be public and you’ll definitely know.

So that’s the answer to the Fermi Paradox!

I hope you’ve enjoyed it. 🙂

Sep 042018
 

What will the plot be? Here’s my guess:

The new show will take place in the Kelvin timeline, after the destruction of Vulcan.

Picard in this timeline never rose to captain. Instead, he’s had a miserable go at it, running his family vineyard. The other members of the crew of the Enterprise went on to do other things, but none had the life they were meant to have.

In Picard’s old age, after a life of disappointment, Q appears to him. Q explains that Picard had a different destiny. The whole series is then Q screwing with him. Picard reunites with old crew mates (except of course he doesn’t recognize them because he has never met them in this timeline) and they have adventures together. Picard is restored to his position as captain of a vessel.

 Posted by on September 4, 2018
Nov 092016
 

We find ourselves in a surreal nightmare. This was a stupid, unnecessary loss, caused by misinformation and carelessness and apathy, and the consequences will be dire. Now we must watch helplessly as our new ignoramus-in-chief dismantles all the progress made over Obama’s presidency. It’s tragic, it’s heartbreaking, it’s maddening. I’m still processing it. And I need more time for that.

But I’m ready to start looking for hope within the gloom. I was reminded today that Gandalf can be a good source of positivity in dark times.

“There are other forces at work in this world besides the will of evil.”

That’s a pretty good quote. And here’s another one, a quote from the abolitionist Theodore Parker:

I do not pretend to understand the moral universe; the arc is a long one, my eye reaches but little ways; I cannot calculate the curve and complete the figure by the experience of sight; I can divine it by conscience. And from what I see I am sure it bends towards justice.

Martin Luther King paraphrased Parker in a line in his “Where Do We Go From Here?” speech, which Obama likes to quote: “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

I believe in this. Not in any supernatural force bending the arc of the moral universe, but that it bends. We bend it. Eventually, love and reason triumph over fear and ignorance.

 Posted by on November 9, 2016
Oct 272015
 

A blogger over at HuffPo has posted his theory that Luke Skywalker actually turned to the Dark Side at the end of Return of the Jedi and will be the villain in the new movie.

It’s a fun read.

The commenters do a good job of ripping his argument to shreds. (It’s the sort of argument that wants to be ripped to shreds.) The movie, after all, was titled Return of the Jedi! If Luke turned to the Dark Side at the end, then the Jedi didn’t return. And if Luke turned evil, why did the ghosts of Yoda and Obi-Wan Kenobi smile at him in the end?

Luke was tempted by the Dark Side. He went right up to the edge. But he didn’t succumb, and in resisting the Emperor, he not only saved his own soul, he saved his father’s. That was the whole point–not just of Return of the Jedi, but of the entire series. Star Wars is about redemption and the power of sacrificial love.

Many people say The Empire Strikes Back is the best film in the series, and those same people complain about all the problems with Return of the Jedi, and they’re probably right. But for me, the most poignant moment in all of Star Wars is this moment in Jedi:

Luke: No, you’re coming with me. I won’t leave you here. I’ve got to save you!
Anakin: You already have, Luke. You were right. You were right about me… Tell your sister… you were right.

That scene reduces me to tears every time.

Luke was able to see the germ of goodness even in the blackest heart in the universe. He risked everything, everything, on the absurd notion that Darth Vader, the poster child for evil, still had goodness in him. And, GODDAMMIT!, he was RIGHT. He walked right into the lion’s den–not to kill or destroy, but to save Anakin. He defied the Emperor. He overcame his hatred and the temptation to use evil to gain power. He threw down his weapon. And he brought his father back from the Dark Side.

Corny? Sappy? Mawkish? No. Not at all. It’s beautiful and powerful and profound.

Lucas set out to create a mythology, and he succeeded. Myths (according to PBS.org) “are sacred tales that explain the world and man’s experience.” Myths aren’t mere escapism. They are fictions, yes, but fictions that tell us greater truths. That’s where Star Wars surpasses most other sci-fi.

I’m sure J.J. Abrams will give us a Star Wars film that’s as gritty and gripping as we want, and that will far surpass Episodes I, II, and III in every measure. But I hope he doesn’t put style before substance. Making Luke the villain might be deliciously dark and gritty, but that shouldn’t be an end in itself. The goal should be to get at those greater truths.

 Posted by on October 27, 2015
Sep 042015
 

The Shepherd's CrownI’m four chapters in. And I just couldn’t wait to post about it. My early review (no spoilers):

CRIVENS! So far it’s perfect! Fun, funny, beautifully written, impactful. It’s as crisp and solid, at least thus far, as the best of Pratchett’s works. It’s stacking up to be a lovely final note on Pratchett’s career, and I can’t help but be emotional about it. Dorky, I know, to get teary-eyed over a children’s fantasy book.

How come this isn’t a top news story? How come the whole world isn’t rejoicing, publicly and loudly and all together, over the gift of this book?

I’m taking it slowly, savoring the read, stretching out my visit to Discworld.

 Posted by on September 4, 2015
Aug 102015
 

I traveled cross-country on a train once and I hoped for a magical sort of experience, but I’m sorry to say—with no offense meant to railfans, whose enthusiasm I applaud—it wasn’t magical, it wasn’t romantic, it was boring.

I finished Raising Steam today. The book takes us on a trip on a train, and unfortunately it’s a boring journey. The novel is the worst I’ve yet read from Pratchett.

The front cover of the book Raising Steam by Terry Pratchett.jpg

The sentence crafting is certainly up to snuff. But the tone is overly triumphant and self-congratulatory. The narrator lets us know at every turn how wonderful and invincible his characters are, and we’re meant to cheer and high-five him the whole way through. I’m not so sure, though, that the characters are that laudable, judging them by their actions, and even worse, the writer loves his characters too much to let them face any real challenges. It’s a given from the start that the good guys will succeed. The plot has a sense of inevitability like, well, trains, and also the monotonous plodding forward of a train. It’s almost as if Pratchett were caricaturizing his own novels or writing his own fan fiction.

So it’s not a great Pratchett novel compared to, say, Going Postal. But though it may have been a bad story, perhaps it was a good goodbye.

Pratchett passed away earlier this year. Raising Steam was his last book published while he lived and the last time Pratchett as an author and we his readers got to romp with Moist and the rest of the crew. So perhaps the celebratory tone is fitting. The good guys kick ass, the bad guys are defeated, and in the end we get to see the characters we love happy and thriving.

But if you’re not yet ready to say bid adieu to Pratchett, you’re in luck. There’s one more chance.

One final Pratchett book will be published posthumously in just a couple of weeks. And then the lights will go down on Discworld permanently. But that book won’t visit Ankh-Morpork. Pratchett’s last book, titled The Shepherd’s Crown, will be a Tiffany Aching book! A children’s book! A book featuring the wee free men!

That’s incredibly exciting.

It will be a children’s book written by a man acutely aware of the cloaked fellow with a scythe standing just there behind him, peering over his shoulder, drumming his bony fingers. I love the Tiffany Aching books, and I yearn to know what sort of Tiffany Aching book Mr. Pratchett would’ve written while staring his own mortality straight in the face.

This is a literary event rivaling (and in my little world far surpassing) Go Set a Watchman in importance.

The UK release date is August 26. We in the USA must wait until September 1. I’ve marked my calendar.

 Posted by on August 10, 2015
Jan 272014
 

DronesI just saw the movie Oblivion. The critics didn’t love it. It only received a 53% rating from Rotten Tomatoes. But the critics are big dumb poopy heads and they’re flat out wrong.

This movie is as visually stunning as promised. The special effects are incredible. The drones look 100% real, and their integration with the live action is seamless. The acting is outstanding. Say what you will about Tom Cruise, the guy knows how to give a nuanced and truthful performance. He’s riveting. Cruise And the directing and writing are good, too. The story is compelling, and the story-telling is done right. Tight, efficient script. No clunky exposition, but by the end you fully understand everything you need to know about the backstory. The action stems organically from the characters pursuing their goals rather than being tacked on artificially.

The only major criticism of Oblivion with any validity is that the story is derivative. If you haven’t seen it yet, skip the rest of this paragraph because it contains spoilers. One of the best sci-fi movies of all time is Moon. The plot of Oblivion ends up being pretty similar. It’s Moon but in a bleak post-apocalyptic setting, with aliens that harvest the Earth’s oceans like in the television series “V”. There have been so many sci-fi movies with post-apocalyptic settings. They’re starting to get a little boring. Why is so much sci-fi so dark? How about a sci-fi movie that’s a little bit bright and happy? How about a vision of Earth that doesn’t involve aliens murderizing everybody?

One minor quibble with Oblivion is that the movie predicts that by the year 2017 we’ll have manned space flights to Titan with suspended animation chambers for the astronauts. Um, no.

I do have one other minor quibble with Oblivion, or not really Oblivion per se, but with alien invasion stories in general:

It makes NO SENSE WHATSOEVER that aliens would come all the way to Earth just to steal our natural resources. Why would aliens expend so much energy wiping out humankind, all just to get at our oceans? Water is easy to find elsewhere. Even within our solar system the aliens could probably extract water from the planets Mars, Neptune, or Uranus; the dwarf planet Ceres; the moons Europa or Enceladus; or any number of icy comets. And couldn’t the aliens just make their own water? Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Milky Way Galaxy, and oxygen is the third must abundant. Burn them together and you get energy to power your spaceship plus plenty of liquid water.

There is nothing on Earth that doesn’t appear in greater abundance elsewhere in the galaxy, with the notable exception of life. If aliens ever visit Earth, they won’t see the life forms here as the obstacle; they will see them as the objective.

And it doesn’t make sense that aliens would come here to enslave or eat us, either. While evil aliens make for fun sci-fi, they’re unrealistic. Here’s why.

Space faring aliens have to be more than just intelligent. In order to develop advanced technology, they also must be highly cooperative. To cooperate on the scale necessary to produce rockets, they have to be social animals. I contend that any species inclined to cooperate on such a scale would not be interested in visiting other aliens for the purpose of killing them or taking their stuff. That just doesn’t add up.

Anyway, the Rare Earth hypothesis is most likely the correct answer to the Fermi paradox. In other words, the reason we haven’t met any aliens yet is because technologically advanced intelligent life is so rare and spread so far apart in the universe that meeting each other face-to-face is virtually impossible.

 Posted by on January 27, 2014
Dec 082013
 

Catching Fire Movie Poster
I’ll keep this brief. I’m not interested in writing a full review of the movie to discuss all the ways it was good, although it was a good movie (with a good cast, good script, decent special effects, etc). I just want to say one thing:

Jennifer Lawrence in this movie is amazing. Her acting, from start to finish, is about a thousand times better than the acting you normally see in action movies, even very good ones. I mean, she stunned me. I left the theater dumbfounded, mumbling about how actors in action movies never win awards for acting, but she should receive an academy award for that performance.

I often find action movies to be excruciatingly boring. There is certainly an artistry to action sequences, but most action movies devolve into clever action sequences mounted atop other clever action sequences, and as clever or artistic as they may be, without compelling characters in the midst of compelling interpersonal dramas, I stop caring about the action pretty quickly.

So this was refreshing. She made imaginary circumstances come alive, and that was a pleasure to watch.

(Her acting may just rescue the upcoming movies in the franchise, which are based on the horrible third book in the otherwise outstanding Hunger Games trilogy. The third is one of the most dismal books I’ve ever read. The plot is fine but the tone is way too dark – so dark it drains all satisfaction out of what is actually a happy ending. Even as a fan of the books, I won’t mind if the film makers change things a bit to make the tone brighter.)

 Posted by on December 8, 2013
Feb 212013
 

Most of modern science fiction is chock full of violence and war. I like a good lightsaber duel, a showdown with laser riffles, or an epic battle between fleets of space ships, just as much as the next sci-fi fan. But I’ve realized that most of our science fiction today is merely a reflection of our current age and our current values, and therefore fails to provide any insights into what the future might really be like.

The science fiction of Jules Verne was different. Verne was able to think outside the box of his age, and so he was able to produce sci-fi with actual predictive power. Gene Roddenberry, too. Star Trek predicted cell phones, microwave ovens, tablet PCs, various medical devices, and racial equality.

What do you think the future will be like? I’ll make a few guesses:

1. Space Battles

There will never be space battles. By the time interplanetary space voyages become commonplace, the idea that you ought to put shields or weapons on your space ship will seem laughable.

Space battles are a pretty silly concept, actually. No amount of shielding would prevent a high-powered laser from penetrating a hull. The laser battles would not only make no noise, they’d be invisible. And computer-guided laser turrets would never miss.

But my bet is that humans in the future will be less warlike, not more.

2. Similarity to Now

For the next couple hundred years, Earth will look pretty much the same as it does today. Skyscrapers will look the same. Roads will look the same. Cars will look the same, although they’ll use different fuel sources. People won’t suddenly start wearing shiny silver jumpsuits. And people will act basically the same way.

There will be a few noticeable differences, though. Solar panels will be ubiquitous. Rooftops in dense urban areas will be covered with vegetable gardens. And flat screens will be everywhere as the technology evolves to allow them to be painted onto unexpected surfaces.

For example, maybe you’ll press a button on your refrigerator and see a full-size image of what’s inside without having to open the door. (And then you’ll be able to live-stream the contents of your fridge to your cell phone, so you can see what you need to buy while strolling around Safeway.)

3. End of the Common Cold

We shouldn’t assume that viral infections will always be commonplace. In our age it’s a given that you’ll contract a cold or flu a couple times a year. Modern medical science doesn’t seem on track to change that. But there is much we could do right now, even without any advance in medical technology, to reduce viral infections simply by preventing their spread. It is normal these days for sick people to ignore their illnesses or to take a single sick-day and then rush back to work/school while they’re still contagious. If we changed our culture so infected people quarantined themselves better we’d see an immediate drop in infection rates.

And with a small advance in medicine we could do even better:

Imagine a drug – let’s call it Virulex – that you can take when you’re sick, and all it does it prevent you from spreading your virus to others. It has no major side effects. It doesn’t do anything else. It doesn’t stop fever or immunize you from future infections. But it can be added to other drugs, like NyQuil. It can even be added to food. Perhaps the FDA mandates that all over-the-counter medicines that target cold or flu must include Virulex.

Virulex isn’t far-fetched. All it must do is neutralize viruses in our mucus. It’s basically just a surgical mask in pill form: It prevents coughing fits and sneezes from spreading infection. Simple!

And yet the effects would be profound. Within a year or so, most common infections would simply vanish from the planet.

Give humankind 100 more years, and I bet we’ll have something like Virulex.

4. Immortality

We also shouldn’t assume that mortality is a necessary part of the human condition. The last half of the 20th century saw a revolution in pharmaceuticals. The next revolution in medicine, a revolution already begun, is in regenerative medicine. We now have hope that damage to nerves and organs, once thought irreparable, will one day be quite curable. And when it becomes clear that any one organ can be saved, the next obvious step is to save all of them, forever.

For all practical purposes, humans will stop aging at around 40. There will still be accidents and fluke illnesses, so given enough time everyone will die, but a lifespan of 1,000 years will be commonplace.

In our current age, we’re hampered by this awful notion that death is natural and that when old people die it shouldn’t be too upsetting – they more-or-less have it coming. I think that’s a horrible, mean-spirited, evil belief, and if you hold it you should be horse-whipped until you beg for mercy. Old people are a treasure, and it is a sin of the young to fail to value them, and a terrible sin at that. Let them live. Let them thrive. Let them live forever if they can.

5. Religion and Science

Within two hundred years, the majority of Americans will identify themselves as irreligious. Americans will become more scientifically literate. However, pseudo-science (superstition disguised as science) will continue to plague our species for a long time to come, probably forever.

6. Sex and marriage

Traditional marriage will continue to break down until it is seen as merely one option in a menu of options, as society adopts a consequentialist approach toward sexual morality: Arrangements between consenting adults are their own business as long as nobody is harmed.

7. Animal Rights

Animal welfare will finally become a mainstream issue. People won’t stop eating animals but they’ll treat farm animals much more humanely than we do today.

8. Off-world Exploration

It is very likely that we’ll colonize both the moon and Mars within a few hundred years.

It is unlikely that FTL travel is possible. Most of our space exploration will be confined to our own solar system. But as human lifespans increase in length and as our spaceships reach speeds at least a bit closer to the speed of light, humans will eventually visit other solar systems.

We will find microbial alien life forms multiple times. We will probably find life within our own solar system – if not existing lifeforms, then signs that they existed in the past.

But we will not mingle with other complex alien lifeforms, particularly not intelligent ones, for tens of thousands of years, if ever.

Earth is our one best home, and our off-world colonies will always pale in comparison.

The great struggle for our species is learning to forge a sustainable lifestyle for our kind on Earth, striking a balance between preserving the natural world and suiting the world to our wants and needs.

I expect we’ll succeed, but this struggle will continue to generate conflicts for some time to come. If there are major wars in the far future, they’ll be over diminishing resources firstly, and secondly over who gets to live on Earth and who doesn’t.

9. Lives Out of Sync

An interesting side-effect of enhanced longevity combined with close-to-light-speed-travel is that it will probably become normal for our lives to get out of sync with each other.

For example, suppose you go on a scientific mission to an exo-planet in a solar system a few light years away, and then you return to Earth. Only six months have passed from your point of view, but twenty years have passed for your mom and dad. Because of special relativity, any trip away from Earth at near light speed is also a trip into the future relative to people who remain on Earth. So when you get home from your trip your parents don’t necessarily look any different, but they’ve lived through a couple decades of stuff you know nothing about.

It will be interesting to see how people cope with massive gaps in their shared histories.

10. AI

Human-like AI is definitely possible, and as soon as we’ve attained it, it won’t be long until engineered minds surpass natural brains. I can’t imagine it will take humans longer than 500 years to accomplish this feat.

We’ve been looking at AI the wrong way. Computer scientists working individually or in small teams have tried to tackle the entire problem in isolation. Their focus has been to assemble software that can pass the Turing Test.

Cracking the problem will take more people and more resources than that – teams of scientists from multiple fields and from around the world, working in concert, backed by huge sums of money. Like with the Large Hadron Collider.

And the Turing Test is a bad test. It’s not how we measure human intelligence, or chimp intelligence, or raven intelligence, so why do we consider it a valid test of machine intelligence?

Machine intelligence, I suspect, will be comprised of several separate modules. It probably can’t fit in one program, but will require hundreds or thousands of programs working together. And perhaps it cannot be programmed at all, but must be evolved within a virtual world where large populations of machine intelligences compete for resources.

AI is the big wild card. The potential game changer.

If we eventually engineer beings who are superior to us in every regard – more intelligent, more durable, more efficient – faster, prettier, funnier, kinder, and happier – more curious, more empathetic, more compassionate, more charming – then what will become of us?

One possibility is that we’ll merge with our creations. We’ll opt to augment our organic brains with inorganic modules. And then eventually we’ll realize the human soul is really just a pile of information. The nature of the container is unimportant. The organic bits will disappear.

It’s very difficult to predict how all of this will impact our civilization, our culture, our psychology, and so on.

11. Art

How will art work in the future? I think it will change in major ways.

We see ourselves as so evolved, but civilization is still relatively young. Infantile, even. Modern civilization began with advent of agriculture in the Neolithic Revolution, only about 10,000 years ago. Written language is only half as old as that. And during that time the population of humans on the planet has been small compared to the population today.

With billions of people on the planet, after ten or twenty thousand years won’t everything that can possibly be said have already been said by somebody else? Won’t every poem have been written? Every melody? Won’t every dance have been danced?

We are buoyed and inspired by our history, but perhaps in the future our descendants will be drowned by theirs. History will overwhelm them, outshine them, undercut them, leave them no room for invention or originality.

The solution is a complete revamp of the way we think about intellectual property, and the end of copyright as we know it.

Ok, those are all my predictions for now.

 Posted by on February 21, 2013
Oct 202012
 

Whenever I hear the song “Madness” by Muse on the radio, a sci-fi fantasy of my own creation plays like a movie in my mind’s eye. If I were a mogul in the entertainment industry I’d expand the concept into a pilot for a television series, and produce it on a network channel, and audiences would love it, and my creation would become the next big thing, and and and… [sigh].

Muse music does that to you. It makes you dream big crazy awesome sci-fi dreams.

So I was pleased to discover that Muse created a big crazy awesome and awesomely funny sci-fi music video for one of their songs, “Knights of Cydonia.”

 Posted by on October 20, 2012
© 2014 Merrily Dancing Ape Site design info